{"id":"W1975059057","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.04.004","title":"Increasing Scientific Confidence in Adverse Outcome Pathways: Application of Tailored Bradford-Hill Considerations for Evaluating Weight of Evidence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; University of Ottawa; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse Outcome Pathway; Confidence interval; Outcome (game theory); Adverse effect; Medicine; Pharmacology; Internal medicine; Computational biology; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4649037,0.003322371,0.004156708,0.01795793,0.003841274,0.02101573,0.007708176,0.0102381,0.008649549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.646305,0.003255408,0.007528841,0.01002442,0.01495433,0.02082634,0.01302246,0.01224581,0.001273167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02563846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02597331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006574905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007539295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4952836,0.3645242,0.05913233,0.0153704,0.062328,0.003361537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1853892,0.702776,0.04577293,0.02370976,0.04030088,0.002051292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001479638,0.0005188765,0.01146804,0.01638341,0.002283783,0.0009354838,0.01602785,0.03145412,0.002090713,0.6808021,0.01441984,0.2221361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009745648,0.001509647,0.009428818,0.01344335,0.001656947,0.0008994334,0.003608885,0.05002496,0.004547825,0.8575374,0.05571603,0.0006521887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02366382,0.00609938,0.8486309,0.04410476,0.0006484059,0.02448794,0.002015717,0.0004660704,0.04988293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1359598,0.001352505,0.8472709,0.003213224,0.0001566841,0.01070475,0.0002567115,0.00006238137,0.00102295],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4649037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6598691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1515994821797793,"score_gpt":0.4379758046526606,"score_spread":0.2863763224728814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}