{"id":"W1975059057","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.04.004","title":"Increasing Scientific Confidence in Adverse Outcome Pathways: Application of Tailored Bradford-Hill Considerations for Evaluating Weight of Evidence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; University of Ottawa; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse Outcome Pathway; Confidence interval; Outcome (game theory); Adverse effect; Medicine; Pharmacology; Internal medicine; Computational biology; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002627457,0.0001111758,0.0002942447,0.0000779025,0.0001119978,0.000004580863,0.0001244243,0.0001063176,0.000122878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001267592,0.00009394715,0.00004375555,0.0001487379,0.0009567136,0.0001743292,0.0001175826,0.0001089914,0.0000040477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007835933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007529595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008029506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005791543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984226,0.0003663004,0.0005093714,0.0003371154,0.000143868,0.0002208017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974903,0.001877497,0.0003099506,0.0001549811,0.00006480151,0.0001024618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001448662,0.00009743199,0.1239562,0.00006689225,0.00001074106,0.000002200691,0.0004749501,0.002082368,0.8710155,0.000933882,0.0002981349,0.0009168087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004831875,0.0008950446,0.1362916,0.000113269,0.0002102197,0.0001085661,0.0004531227,0.07513347,0.7626018,0.01797816,0.0009392897,0.0004435568],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982308,0.000260472,0.000240346,0.0002789462,0.0002234913,0.0006575851,0.000008387966,0.00001315688,0.00008683763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967268,0.000009731994,0.002977098,0.0001331358,0.00002392063,0.00008911609,0.00000422009,0.000007439936,0.00002852097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1084138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3831053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1515994821797793,"score_gpt":0.4379758046526606,"score_spread":0.2863763224728814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}