{"id":"W1975069902","doi":"10.7202/1016047ar","title":"Urban Waste Sinks as a Natural Resource: The Case of the Fraser River","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban History Review","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Natural (archaeology); Technocracy; Natural resource; Sewerage; Civil engineering; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Engineering; Politics; Environmental engineering; Geography; Political science; Law; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002257595,0.0001912855,0.0002453699,0.00001275005,0.0002199596,0.000001334711,0.0005085603,0.00004578166,0.004574328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002383901,0.0001021076,0.0002727878,0.0001377013,0.004055887,0.00009619034,0.0002484475,0.0003085885,0.0009812458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001296468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002348017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000311611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007342124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986683,0.0002062559,0.0002946224,0.000294063,0.0003266839,0.0002101459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989389,0.0000477834,0.0002582039,0.0006641579,0.000003721439,0.00008727187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006778615,0.00006013566,0.0004720334,0.00006677952,0.0000108054,0.00004676822,0.001309594,0.00002311331,0.0001254589,0.00006061546,0.9856613,0.01215659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001019173,0.0000254564,0.0005415655,0.0001931984,0.00007277049,0.0002279766,0.0001535834,0.00002425353,0.00002059702,0.000005309485,0.9984829,0.0001504006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1311431,0.7517536,0.000004303221,0.004460576,0.0005664293,0.001097025,0.00001216103,0.00004518639,0.1109176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7988746,0.006485167,0.000143353,0.02940851,0.0003014778,0.00005569463,0.000005584243,0.00004924684,0.1646764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7452684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008699959289231077,"score_gpt":0.1931822845909179,"score_spread":0.1844823253016868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}