{"id":"W1975142928","doi":"10.1139/l02-105","title":"Estimating the urban metabolism of Canadian cities: Greater Toronto Area case study","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"North Carolina State University","keywords":"Urban metabolism; Population; Material flow analysis; Urban area; Environmental science; Sustainability; Environmental engineering; Cycling; Wastewater; Energy consumption; Geography; Urban planning; Urban density; Ecology; Biology; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009204242,0.0001250069,0.0002656404,0.0001584276,0.0001899463,0.00004549659,0.0002198064,0.00004956715,0.003293602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004321365,0.000088858,0.0001104655,0.000376338,0.00005899607,0.0001985914,0.00001075847,0.0001465166,0.000002753577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008535881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002054232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8694836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988694,0.0000730118,0.0004011507,0.0001122612,0.0001581371,0.0003860632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989221,0.00006272169,0.0001176987,0.0001976366,0.00003990798,0.0006599004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001713143,0.00002069273,0.38193,0.00002239182,0.0001790829,0.003571567,0.01930761,0.5933107,0.00002329272,0.0001326116,0.001278559,0.0002217901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002457189,0.0009800955,0.5027167,0.0002372051,0.001280426,0.01548437,0.2899174,0.07052319,0.0001363465,0.0005829547,0.1136252,0.00205894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995346,0.0002819811,0.0003695536,0.00006270043,0.0002666508,0.0001390781,0.000003829073,0.000003200083,0.003527017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996242,8.795596e-7,0.0001860038,0.00003412127,0.0000504431,0.000004965358,1.30109e-7,0.000009656969,0.00008958031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5227875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01134851642361746,"score_gpt":0.1837898928994554,"score_spread":0.1724413764758379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}