{"id":"W1975182901","doi":"10.1080/13642980802532887","title":"Too political or not political enough? A Foucauldian reading of the<i>Responsibility to Protect</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Commission; Politics; Legitimacy; Responsibility to protect; Sovereignty; Political science; Human rights; Law; Reading (process); Power (physics); State (computer science); International law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004780557,0.0004326436,0.0004183538,0.001015917,0.003910819,0.006269683,0.001135753,0.005620215,0.002211388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007800285,0.000210154,0.0004209414,0.0008661444,0.0468602,0.007609941,0.00209605,0.008546682,0.00047229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004949237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003765521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009360288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007822151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964469,0.001882183,0.00008338958,0.0004737733,0.0007635787,0.0003502105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977018,0.001420091,0.0002368731,0.0002315332,0.0003053514,0.0001042877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002508247,0.000002093155,0.00002689193,0.000008042283,6.940367e-7,0.00001481283,0.002128543,0.00002514217,0.00003236524,0.992293,0.003812803,0.00165305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006400609,0.000009317913,0.0001783886,0.0001039628,0.000003089679,0.00005044206,0.00153486,0.0001579184,0.0001404932,0.8986304,0.09917605,0.000008609209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01831619,0.009754505,0.04093919,0.4684012,0.003326435,0.00004126945,0.00007792028,0.0000752679,0.459068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828357,0.003001572,0.01068751,0.06339327,0.002059822,0.0001462002,0.00003868253,0.0001135667,0.03772369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009360288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03590941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02907328526654931,"score_gpt":0.367530586746633,"score_spread":0.3384573014800837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}