{"id":"W1975182901","doi":"10.1080/13642980802532887","title":"Too political or not political enough? A Foucauldian reading of the<i>Responsibility to Protect</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Commission; Politics; Legitimacy; Responsibility to protect; Sovereignty; Political science; Human rights; Law; Reading (process); Power (physics); State (computer science); International law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00121055,0.00009665723,0.0001878361,0.00009293812,0.0004148138,0.0000989131,0.00129367,0.00006825442,0.00009446088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006222698,0.00004969321,0.0001895887,0.0001310661,0.0003175302,0.0001655991,0.00007321282,0.0003027128,0.000009314349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000393155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000327986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001958314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004453395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976007,0.0003067946,0.0004725389,0.0001118373,0.001139067,0.0003690663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985658,0.0002626728,0.0001981359,0.0001881982,0.0005553045,0.0002299034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002914877,0.0001268817,0.0001056324,0.000001395325,0.00003074311,0.00002785338,0.002997516,0.000003425189,0.0008827907,0.9946866,0.0007336001,0.0001120982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000685241,0.0006221859,0.01696704,0.000191941,0.00005547184,0.000144109,0.001982246,0.00003417938,0.005641373,0.9380103,0.03545804,0.0002078163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197105,0.000004691845,0.00004750181,0.06542531,0.0004115365,0.0002099745,0.00001457595,0.000009006932,0.01416694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951671,6.1875e-7,0.0001503514,0.003016249,0.0006855942,9.502631e-7,4.286115e-7,0.000003585257,0.0009750899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07545666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3190455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02907328526654931,"score_gpt":0.367530586746633,"score_spread":0.3384573014800837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}