{"id":"W1975281063","doi":"10.1348/096317902321119709","title":"A critical re‐examination and analysis of cognitive ability tests using the Thorndike model of fairness","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","topic":"Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Industrial and organizational psychology; Test (biology); Response bias; Cognition; Personnel selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006776371,0.00008811919,0.0003309888,0.0004121583,0.0001033563,0.00001253704,0.00007686955,0.00009298801,0.000286584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001122071,0.0000721607,0.00007131881,0.0006529845,0.0002745622,0.0002332592,0.00002697381,0.0001027948,0.000001102808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002101049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002840425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004762942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002596785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987512,0.00007005323,0.0008002446,0.000163248,0.000137077,0.00007818506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997403,0.0008099973,0.0007595216,0.00007434801,0.0009102956,0.00004288114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001431865,0.0002567818,0.8481624,0.00002810511,0.0002792566,4.604038e-7,0.0007959389,0.002771831,0.0005733471,0.1463977,0.00005753658,0.0005334991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003135433,0.00006123221,0.8620169,0.00002336851,0.0001234026,0.0000147474,0.00004798922,0.1007515,0.00003088411,0.03654482,0.000007835873,0.00006386133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513297,0.0005992648,0.04656876,0.000791385,0.00010944,0.00006429198,0.0002757564,0.000002068454,0.0002593479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996517,0.00005750997,0.003100563,0.0001988425,0.00005885349,6.654946e-7,0.00003658323,0.000006646654,0.00002332674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1098529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3137893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1222846286021153,"score_gpt":0.3622652602019257,"score_spread":0.2399806315998104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}