{"id":"W1975317780","doi":"10.1007/s10640-006-9051-x","title":"‘Adopt a Hypothetical Pup’: A Count Data Approach to the Valuation of Wildlife","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Resource Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"St. Francis Xavier University","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Payment card; Wildlife; Count data; Payment; Phone; Valuation (finance); Survey data collection; Economics; Agricultural economics; Geography; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Finance; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008105254,0.0001636729,0.0002805269,0.00006901561,0.0001373109,0.00004614017,0.0003746251,0.0000927887,0.0001591172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001312391,0.0001540206,0.00005665363,0.00003313554,0.0002050801,0.0001743396,0.0003456848,0.0001075595,0.0004851931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001410495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000555261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001366246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008734867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985586,0.00002265364,0.0006305749,0.0005365101,0.00004060833,0.0002110903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989849,0.00004195537,0.000269022,0.0006288983,0.000001206122,0.00007397801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001698783,0.001995812,0.6485127,0.0000768814,0.0003049987,0.000001152711,0.002609255,0.05922252,0.000354442,0.2432343,0.03098182,0.01253628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001053196,0.0001151677,0.5180043,0.000006917057,0.00003598688,0.00002062036,0.0007308823,0.05949842,0.00008155049,0.008810225,0.4111544,0.0004883843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750851,0.0007587709,0.001859751,0.001345058,0.00008381288,0.0004011062,0.0006539401,0.00001059343,0.01980187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956703,0.0002043733,0.001505911,0.0008812782,0.000168564,0.00002598508,0.0004250998,0.00002754293,0.001090953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3801725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6280777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08656003416142685,"score_gpt":0.1828458954779617,"score_spread":0.09628586131653485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}