{"id":"W1975338270","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2005.08.001","title":"The compound Poisson risk model with a threshold dividend strategy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insurance Mathematics and Economics","topic":"Probability and Risk Models","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dividend; Ruin theory; Poisson distribution; Mathematics; Exponential function; Exponential distribution; Risk model; Constant (computer programming); Compound Poisson process; Econometrics; Applied mathematics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Poisson process; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004360705,0.001253474,0.002851197,0.001385446,0.0007133292,0.005041145,0.00316476,0.005305153,0.007394946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01206841,0.001143829,0.001582793,0.001626832,0.00246581,0.006460146,0.001753339,0.003188061,0.0009959817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001865681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001829607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00435479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001616227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983859,0.0004968713,0.00009478252,0.0003478757,0.0003515481,0.0003230904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933391,0.004282324,0.0008270182,0.0003455992,0.0006266183,0.0005792669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001642398,0.00009204903,0.001551292,0.0001188233,0.00009800399,0.0006794238,0.00013955,0.2365258,0.0009222007,0.7512946,0.002157772,0.006256221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007746688,0.00004514714,0.0004043902,0.00002072144,0.0000592595,0.0002735275,0.00003938573,0.7361931,0.0001986955,0.2617032,0.0009394443,0.00004568532],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1944139,0.00427749,0.7559395,0.008685922,0.0006433444,0.0001653698,0.0008431343,0.0003392737,0.0346922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9257469,0.002677613,0.02554779,0.000512817,0.0006660006,0.0001414924,0.000271799,0.00007155778,0.04436406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007394946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02473855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08930563941775405,"score_gpt":0.3088814755118484,"score_spread":0.2195758360940943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}