{"id":"W1975372021","doi":"10.1208/pt040224","title":"Evaluation of the conformity index and the mahalanobis distance as a tool for process analysis: A technical note","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AAPS PharmSciTech","topic":"Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"Purdue Pharma; Purdue University","keywords":"Mahalanobis distance; Conformity; Index (typography); Process (computing); Conformity assessment; Computer science; Process engineering; Data mining; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Operations management; World Wide Web; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006591592,0.001146402,0.001420768,0.003227131,0.000557546,0.001817106,0.001742474,0.001075479,0.002261777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02294641,0.0005215445,0.001300577,0.002708596,0.0007850672,0.00237863,0.001134914,0.001565015,0.001596981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006229571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009293942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001470171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001455193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992434,0.002073767,0.0005121563,0.0006212005,0.004234142,0.0001247147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823813,0.01027536,0.0007354565,0.001840402,0.004595024,0.0001724958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000425077,0.0003234452,0.007660155,0.0003655374,0.0002391106,0.0001698322,0.0001812285,0.04516568,0.09899326,0.01996811,0.002184705,0.8243238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002474277,0.0006144707,0.005489509,0.00002982682,0.0001033022,0.0005534122,0.0001103575,0.7967485,0.1793217,0.01110236,0.005775657,0.0001262541],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02249815,0.0004549523,0.9743341,0.0001156482,0.0000482685,0.00006352446,0.0001536686,0.001012473,0.001319236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1895169,0.0004507701,0.8063926,0.00003562729,0.00005753427,0.0001597978,0.0005007393,0.0004422872,0.002443825],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006591592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03486007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01820109273631799,"score_gpt":0.3447071638900421,"score_spread":0.3265060711537241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}