{"id":"W1975372021","doi":"10.1208/pt040224","title":"Evaluation of the conformity index and the mahalanobis distance as a tool for process analysis: A technical note","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AAPS PharmSciTech","topic":"Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"Purdue Pharma; Purdue University","keywords":"Mahalanobis distance; Conformity; Index (typography); Process (computing); Conformity assessment; Computer science; Process engineering; Data mining; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Operations management; World Wide Web; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00135901,0.0001333102,0.0002856657,0.00007642199,0.0001514855,0.00003571454,0.0002977808,0.0001017956,0.0003698675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001419415,0.00007482532,0.0002008273,0.00140577,0.0002221124,0.00007764186,0.00003304051,0.0001723335,9.181861e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007295025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001532038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002447691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002779347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986005,0.00004753117,0.0002884053,0.0002455186,0.0006387975,0.0001792471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987544,0.0002418115,0.0002284825,0.0004012859,0.0003442825,0.00002970601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004636279,0.00261951,0.4477436,0.002702684,0.01465582,0.000005151427,0.005345179,0.00251858,0.3677646,0.09549055,0.002227065,0.05429101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005401876,0.00002347608,0.00220158,0.00002917127,0.01072709,0.00001791813,0.0004713023,0.0170505,0.9315789,0.03084078,0.001355263,0.0003021405],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972464,0.001216507,0.01287689,0.0003993992,0.00003067089,0.0006412814,0.00005644811,0.00004781431,0.01226701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991589,0.00002663889,0.00009968317,0.0001079291,0.00001943208,0.0002325804,0.000006009824,0.000008669174,0.0003401738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5638143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.404979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01820109273631799,"score_gpt":0.3447071638900421,"score_spread":0.3265060711537241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}