{"id":"W1975598054","doi":"10.1057/rpm.2010.2","title":"Revenue optimization of risk-averse managers with atemporal utility","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue management; Risk aversion (psychology); Stochastic dominance; Yield management; Revenue; Economics; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Volatility (finance); Risk-seeking; Variance (accounting); Limit (mathematics); Ambiguity aversion; Econometrics; Computer science; Financial economics; Mathematics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003296567,0.001062849,0.001828672,0.0005647248,0.000487553,0.002710412,0.001692773,0.001795661,0.004011409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113326,0.0009139791,0.0006052283,0.0006844332,0.001328409,0.002455411,0.00173422,0.001511881,0.0004250661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001271342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001168267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002875008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001355398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986731,0.000657058,0.00004321341,0.0001454386,0.0001036846,0.0003775337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935789,0.004502776,0.0005965584,0.0002555985,0.0003490591,0.0007170488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001096518,0.0005710641,0.00366162,0.00009748437,0.0001202194,0.0006330409,0.0002031712,0.911689,0.002114665,0.05425947,0.002450776,0.023103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006688873,0.0001628929,0.0005120058,0.000006457331,0.00001934496,0.00005699513,0.0000731186,0.9826188,0.000282528,0.01600239,0.0001855421,0.00001308531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7389137,0.0007840295,0.2384676,0.002820939,0.0001152278,0.0001841696,0.0001705495,0.0002524681,0.01829139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915136,0.0001385354,0.004730248,0.00005782961,0.00004350521,0.00001807639,0.0000238551,0.00001581489,0.003458538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004011409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01743412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00824988369684217,"score_gpt":0.1979451284010816,"score_spread":0.1896952447042395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}