{"id":"W1975625019","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.03.012","title":"A framework for fit-for-purpose dose response assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Stakeholder; Variety (cybernetics); Risk analysis (engineering); Agency (philosophy); Population; Computer science; Management science; Engineering; Business; Medicine; Political science; Environmental health; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05834373,0.004272099,0.002615175,0.005578803,0.002241426,0.008164496,0.009368994,0.006487163,0.01034996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05257284,0.001726146,0.005739151,0.004257735,0.006739769,0.006527727,0.00695864,0.008228817,0.003894643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009278996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01349845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008437058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9555736,0.03207579,0.001942797,0.002336357,0.007031813,0.001039532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691647,0.02050628,0.001167907,0.00288986,0.005630049,0.0006411548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002659156,0.00008790789,0.0002956935,0.0003867046,0.00006362846,0.0001541755,0.0005350611,0.05832894,0.0003562862,0.9087139,0.005241167,0.02580991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003602004,0.0001081489,0.0001241344,0.0004669685,0.00004393238,0.0001509963,0.0002671726,0.1063266,0.0004608702,0.8281741,0.06377362,0.00006752129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002696943,0.0003272333,0.9886215,0.001407511,0.00007408739,0.0004944545,0.0001578337,0.0002494113,0.008398302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01945028,0.0006414183,0.9740107,0.0006457198,0.00009560044,0.00244573,0.0003629952,0.0001787667,0.002168732],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05834373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3085549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02591482781520102,"score_gpt":0.3596299835367727,"score_spread":0.3337151557215717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}