{"id":"W1975625019","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.03.012","title":"A framework for fit-for-purpose dose response assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Stakeholder; Variety (cybernetics); Risk analysis (engineering); Agency (philosophy); Population; Computer science; Management science; Engineering; Business; Medicine; Political science; Environmental health; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006457411,0.0002454894,0.0003104964,0.00008152727,0.0002748226,0.00002535612,0.0001813566,0.000545679,0.0003377214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007285678,0.0002448024,0.0001566903,0.00006012226,0.0002601886,0.000007844436,0.0001371177,0.0001643809,0.000006732437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004607665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002243637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003087904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006078299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982896,0.0002729316,0.0002925779,0.0005665885,0.00007273586,0.0005055715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988898,0.0003595893,0.0001242052,0.0002767187,0.0001499457,0.0001997559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001578314,0.0001930593,0.0009625637,0.00006208076,0.0001882287,0.000002428169,0.00004680933,0.00006219774,0.9695797,0.003980754,0.02011258,0.003231298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00624006,0.005597952,0.1305452,0.00001527726,0.0002640236,0.0000975853,0.0001763255,0.001365887,0.4743071,0.01024069,0.3703119,0.0008379325],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786632,0.0007765137,0.01525716,0.002435167,0.0007498582,0.001951211,0.00008114474,0.0000238162,0.00006191537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748964,0.00011451,0.01694832,0.004569751,0.0005610467,0.001910621,0.00005410591,0.00003645894,0.000908788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4952725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02591482781520102,"score_gpt":0.3596299835367727,"score_spread":0.3337151557215717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}