{"id":"W1975785613","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14947.x","title":"Assessing the dust selection bias in quasar absorbers at : Zn/Fe abundances in a radio-selected sample","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society","topic":"Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Redshift; Astrophysics; Quasar; Lambda; Equivalent width; Spectral line; Line (geometry); Absorption (acoustics); Emission spectrum; Absorption spectroscopy; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Astronomy; Galaxy; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006414353,0.0001718445,0.0002714135,0.001295356,0.0002565672,0.0004984934,0.0003114818,0.0001970089,0.0008993192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002127716,0.0001498135,0.0001450007,0.0004341479,0.0002680248,0.0002437615,0.0004971381,0.0001458476,0.0003240389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001617776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009106774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003305616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004064696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996575,0.00006273283,0.00003415497,0.0000956598,0.00008506261,0.00006482723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998201,0.0003120801,0.0007290144,0.000219619,0.0003215123,0.0002167254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004828447,0.00001376296,0.9950891,0.000003175096,0.00002029357,0.00003747539,0.0001050621,0.00003912031,0.003322318,0.00001769189,0.00003087361,0.001272933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002382813,0.00003196138,0.9989883,8.575893e-7,0.000009944933,0.0001153049,0.00009490024,0.0001555906,0.00049069,0.00001148452,0.00009734271,0.000001224141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997258,0.00002125729,0.00006755424,0.000004173925,4.140146e-7,0.000002441656,0.00006225352,0.000002117168,0.0001140786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995036,0.00001869113,0.0001052921,0.00001125566,0.000002954311,0.000003579205,0.0002413182,0.000002167497,0.0001111002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003305616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006572723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01343978294369084,"score_gpt":0.2325196242300575,"score_spread":0.2190798412863667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}