{"id":"W1975810300","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v6n9p88","title":"Community Forestry in Germany, a Case Study Seen Through the Lens of the International Model","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Community forestry; Sustainability; German; Devolution (biology); Forestry; Livelihood; Forest management; Business; Political science; Environmental resource management; Economics; Sociology; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008197249,0.00007634878,0.00009878768,0.00004494995,0.0003617883,0.00003842398,0.0006382785,0.00002232837,0.0001351382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003630756,0.00004287304,0.00004347587,0.0001881102,0.0001280615,0.0002855928,0.001042613,0.0002471191,0.000005358092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004796121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008165051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007020207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000933605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989159,0.0001125049,0.0003405227,0.00006052923,0.0004169355,0.0001536244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994264,0.00003873322,0.0002483695,0.0001801546,0.0000837251,0.00002261196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001656714,0.0005802046,0.9014958,0.00001925783,0.00007167053,0.0002559936,0.07187011,0.02268181,0.00002111213,0.00003593343,0.002420758,0.0005307826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003905668,0.00002691109,0.7406014,0.000009792778,0.00001178699,0.00006323501,0.2531493,0.0009524184,0.00002082369,0.0004459407,0.004275722,0.00005213078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937757,0.000008214684,0.0000926076,0.003453111,0.00004608287,0.0004002273,3.555006e-7,0.000002004028,0.002221648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968787,0.000004981985,0.0003320547,0.0003606167,0.000007565097,0.000007577039,1.983671e-7,0.000003018232,0.002405234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1812792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02523244674549179,"score_gpt":0.2258672301846311,"score_spread":0.2006347834391393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}