{"id":"W1975855690","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342049","title":"The Legal Politics of the Article 16 Decision: The International Criminal Court, the un Security Council and Ontologies of a Contemporary Compromise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Center for Africana Studies, Johns Hopkins University; University of Pennsylvania; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Law; International law; Statute; Politics; Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; Sociology; State of exception; Compromise; Political science; Statute of limitations","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01399659,0.0005022699,0.0006390833,0.002756685,0.01630463,0.02305568,0.001748886,0.01090751,0.003036212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01438438,0.0005031619,0.0004341233,0.002659041,0.08324309,0.01692844,0.007032842,0.0119462,0.0004468739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02017082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01219154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01990626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01932087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880874,0.00725744,0.0003658829,0.0009595835,0.002005598,0.00132409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942688,0.004024548,0.0004301498,0.0004467915,0.0004638722,0.0003658172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000104726,0.000001678143,0.00002295401,0.000004025526,3.813275e-7,0.00001231658,0.003819175,0.00003772664,0.000007541292,0.9948297,0.0007097386,0.0005537213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000611754,0.000008948205,0.0001947138,0.0002790431,0.000003900609,0.00005374132,0.01122764,0.0003069129,0.0001050087,0.8251643,0.1626318,0.00001800483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03376134,0.01197228,0.0120953,0.114058,0.001375492,0.00003573723,0.0000457892,0.00004143524,0.8266145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534908,0.002887733,0.003390538,0.01037114,0.0008443822,0.0001153988,0.00003378321,0.00008705791,0.02877917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02305568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1463502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06096367762002915,"score_gpt":0.3105252685876769,"score_spread":0.2495615909676477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}