{"id":"W1975952334","doi":"10.1007/pl00011384","title":"Conditions ensuring the applicability of cutting-plane methods for solving variational inequalities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Optimization and Variational Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Monotonic function; Cutting-plane method; Variational inequality; Regular polygon; Plane (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Applied mathematics; Inequality; Variational analysis; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01015732,0.002648021,0.002418681,0.002897103,0.001971778,0.003977945,0.002936694,0.003590003,0.006234088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06786124,0.001051577,0.001938239,0.002265497,0.003903711,0.003952492,0.005060454,0.008037418,0.002496634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008857939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003641495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002717254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001362496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956026,0.00133498,0.0004234517,0.0005303809,0.001697342,0.0004113043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727972,0.01807837,0.001622719,0.001463031,0.005282216,0.0007564335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005349977,0.0002486744,0.001156782,0.001085935,0.000162634,0.0006217228,0.0006845855,0.1708055,0.03125654,0.7232897,0.008855352,0.0612976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014723,0.0001874593,0.000869313,0.0004996812,0.00008642535,0.000367912,0.0003295363,0.4940956,0.01840771,0.4727092,0.01220542,0.00009440996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01607947,0.0006717611,0.9624991,0.0006776163,0.0002268953,0.000317916,0.0005759308,0.0002308963,0.01872045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3865513,0.004754763,0.5901939,0.0009041762,0.0009079345,0.002211293,0.00296827,0.0011402,0.01036818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01015732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05371773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0348545579723836,"score_gpt":0.348124457870492,"score_spread":0.3132698998981084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}