{"id":"W1975952334","doi":"10.1007/pl00011384","title":"Conditions ensuring the applicability of cutting-plane methods for solving variational inequalities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Programming","topic":"Optimization and Variational Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Monotonic function; Cutting-plane method; Variational inequality; Regular polygon; Plane (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Applied mathematics; Inequality; Variational analysis; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001928855,0.00009257369,0.00019501,0.00004450179,0.0002578722,0.0001232595,0.000357448,0.00004009492,0.0003621203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005474849,0.00006601508,0.0001225792,0.0003053971,0.00006771968,0.0001669651,0.00005583448,0.00006948144,0.00001207386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001898602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003275431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007346613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.645089e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988359,0.0001276217,0.0004537886,0.0002023585,0.0002010497,0.0001792421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694,0.002459274,0.0001256081,0.0002859066,0.0001440015,0.00004523187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002431412,0.000121477,0.00002887394,0.00008338496,0.00004638972,7.002716e-8,0.001006198,0.001647787,0.00008230611,0.8935432,0.00001715732,0.1034208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001371069,0.00001942303,0.0001438089,0.00001724436,0.00003261305,0.000003893342,0.00009291872,0.7451814,0.0002870728,0.2518659,0.002125059,0.00009360183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004674915,0.00001572034,0.996447,0.001202189,0.00001994153,0.0003325105,0.000006688788,0.00008229799,0.001426119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1383611,0.000001032594,0.8611262,0.00008682882,0.00003814956,0.0001661412,0.00001645007,0.000005558256,0.0001985113],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7435336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3964963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0348545579723836,"score_gpt":0.348124457870492,"score_spread":0.3132698998981084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}