{"id":"W1975977486","doi":"10.1007/s10612-009-9083-y","title":"Methodology as a Knife Fight: The Process, Politics and Paradox of Evaluating Surveillance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Criminology","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Politics; Analogy; Adversary; Disadvantaged; Sociology; Position (finance); Process (computing); Style (visual arts); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Computer security; Economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005781584,0.0001278438,0.0003875921,0.0001214399,0.000208784,0.0000564005,0.0004658521,0.0001313242,0.0008802962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03374569,0.00007679811,0.00005716416,0.0002187538,0.0007483265,0.0001336943,0.00006962869,0.000229307,0.00008694657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001454307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002562199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001687284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008078344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963815,0.001337886,0.0007112171,0.0003788449,0.0008099641,0.000380614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887264,0.009775614,0.0001373764,0.0004456124,0.0008121103,0.0001029272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006099111,0.00009701681,0.006797302,0.00002648828,0.00001126182,0.000006106434,0.002107026,0.00004613258,0.001189069,0.8837891,0.0007118265,0.1051577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003227914,0.0008671292,0.1321784,0.000009130505,0.00002851672,0.0001085357,0.001909835,0.005630859,0.001391651,0.8557674,0.001662645,0.0001231855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9368747,0.0006548642,0.003550797,0.04944908,0.0002657128,0.0001849441,0.00000694827,0.00002488188,0.008988017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911737,0.0000247323,0.003728478,0.004795285,0.0000692266,0.00001104908,0.000001718186,0.00000441253,0.000191353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1253811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9743935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6313472855110329,"score_gpt":0.6196195568159659,"score_spread":0.011727728695067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}