{"id":"W1975977486","doi":"10.1007/s10612-009-9083-y","title":"Methodology as a Knife Fight: The Process, Politics and Paradox of Evaluating Surveillance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Criminology","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Politics; Analogy; Adversary; Disadvantaged; Sociology; Position (finance); Process (computing); Style (visual arts); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Computer security; Economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.410688,0.001424211,0.003177085,0.01202924,0.01100656,0.03803388,0.004755534,0.01311183,0.003500751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5357395,0.001403637,0.0009324108,0.007602714,0.0907036,0.04165837,0.01247157,0.01578858,0.0005699133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01786839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02308454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008268528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009148289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5479843,0.3879456,0.007438884,0.009753195,0.04351611,0.003361972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3618163,0.5716638,0.01909204,0.01795126,0.02498165,0.004494914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001131927,0.00008844188,0.003572472,0.000426373,0.0001362685,0.00007318411,0.01175691,0.001903725,0.000222282,0.8900169,0.00842538,0.08326493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004525511,0.00006078785,0.001463839,0.0008146255,0.00003100769,0.0000711878,0.004647026,0.005809869,0.000411095,0.9745961,0.01196622,0.00008298824],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06821407,0.02634601,0.2980351,0.499366,0.001966063,0.0005079375,0.0001411878,0.0003051015,0.1051186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8917685,0.002990359,0.08753803,0.01283139,0.001269172,0.0005706508,0.00002767178,0.0002868102,0.002717524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7267267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6313472855110329,"score_gpt":0.6196195568159659,"score_spread":0.011727728695067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}