{"id":"W1975994236","doi":"10.1002/sim.3854","title":"The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":359,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada","keywords":"Propensity score matching; Covariate; Statistics; Confidence interval; Observational study; Estimator; Mean squared error; Relative risk; Matching (statistics); Inverse probability weighting; Mathematics; Econometrics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002631738,0.0002643031,0.0008062118,0.0002353378,0.0002441914,0.00001417905,0.0003253413,0.00009620264,0.00005521493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03792186,0.000143284,0.00002722164,0.0004320852,0.0009272676,0.0001196024,0.0001023196,0.0008582094,2.497175e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009533988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001214929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001364446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007370234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973568,0.000315674,0.001313239,0.000327436,0.0003375704,0.0003493356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852414,0.01307567,0.0008802807,0.0003620829,0.000393974,0.00004661301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000309543,0.0004624946,0.7223801,0.001047106,0.0001127273,0.000006667992,0.006077092,0.0000578094,0.001407905,0.1472827,0.001209045,0.1196468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005530612,0.0005105432,0.3495131,0.0008738831,0.00006327072,0.000004079663,0.001196729,0.04699414,0.0003690312,0.5997149,0.00001943077,0.0001878482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.7761584,0.00008380621,0.2216749,0.0002329681,0.0004197104,0.001163151,0.0002083824,0.00003962277,0.00001906395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3462323,0.0007670073,0.6521072,0.000006848166,0.00007758733,0.0006567338,0.00002579235,0.00001655622,0.000109973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4524322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9701821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4011751616883879,"score_gpt":0.5200551633034011,"score_spread":0.1188800016150132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}