{"id":"W1976065557","doi":"10.3390/toxics2020291","title":"Using Statistical and Probabilistic Methods to Evaluate Health Risk Assessment: A Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toxics","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental science; Risk assessment; Health risk assessment; Water quality; Exposure assessment; Pollutant; Environmental health; Human health; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability engineering; Engineering; Business; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004566695,0.0001198251,0.0001917995,0.00002506351,0.0002939352,0.00006238811,0.00007576287,0.0000268627,0.0003464785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001884894,0.0001036136,0.00001495059,0.0001352667,0.00008543605,0.00007595706,0.0001931357,0.0001403294,0.00004172534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002752616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000341563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003916969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008367492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967549,0.002113872,0.0002827184,0.0003257874,0.0002607687,0.0002619227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999127,0.0002364508,0.00009192787,0.0002497702,0.000007270864,0.0002875951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000830335,0.003049293,0.1755779,0.0001798587,0.0001289293,0.0003175669,0.03919083,0.06372289,0.001759778,0.01056988,0.001642368,0.7037777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002203041,0.003388889,0.2514482,0.00003081154,0.0002242014,0.0007028161,0.003992138,0.7097818,0.00008612209,0.01888999,0.008392056,0.0008599648],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5770057,0.000002838412,0.4218428,0.0002652558,0.00006032961,0.0004495918,0.00002090712,0.00002085183,0.0003317832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6888613,0.000001084185,0.3106545,0.0004054527,0.00001664249,0.00001384659,0.000001131368,0.000007226105,0.00003883236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7029178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5921311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1323604731615145,"score_gpt":0.4975003524725654,"score_spread":0.3651398793110509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}