{"id":"W1976223977","doi":"10.2316/journal.203.2007.4.203-3636","title":"LAGRANGIAN RELAXATION-BASED PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION FOR UNIT COMMITMENT PROBLEM","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Power and Energy Systems","topic":"Electric Power System Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lagrangian relaxation; Particle swarm optimization; Mathematical optimization; Relaxation (psychology); Convergence (economics); Lagrangian; Limit (mathematics); Power system simulation; Computer science; Economic dispatch; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005758862,0.0001077031,0.0001526028,0.0002032793,0.00003833649,0.00008441613,0.0001455133,0.00006801156,0.000009068889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003019762,0.00009916272,0.00006004544,0.0001279231,0.00001256073,0.0001991201,0.000006603206,0.00005857061,7.625274e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001388082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003069563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003192433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001151746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988646,0.0000272516,0.0005658623,0.00007853926,0.0003090169,0.0001547641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989638,0.0001282448,0.0002267155,0.00006865065,0.0005225329,0.00009009483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005897937,0.00003447476,0.0007597624,0.0000234288,0.0001486876,0.000008265761,0.0001984278,0.9939419,0.0002654089,0.002853239,0.000591305,0.001116139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001626364,0.0001881213,0.0003122351,0.0001791917,0.0000344546,0.0001000181,0.000172581,0.9702932,0.002595228,0.00004761824,0.02427269,0.0001783054],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008855176,0.000796016,0.9865291,0.0001349925,0.001966811,0.00009012038,0.000007502511,0.00004659676,0.001573678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946524,0.00004694057,0.004838565,0.00004565731,0.0002114929,0.00001009497,0.00001893177,0.00002415025,0.0001517617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4043738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007849771026057564,"score_gpt":0.2251284250195706,"score_spread":0.217278653993513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}