{"id":"W1976223977","doi":"10.2316/journal.203.2007.4.203-3636","title":"LAGRANGIAN RELAXATION-BASED PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION FOR UNIT COMMITMENT PROBLEM","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Power and Energy Systems","topic":"Electric Power System Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lagrangian relaxation; Particle swarm optimization; Mathematical optimization; Relaxation (psychology); Convergence (economics); Lagrangian; Limit (mathematics); Power system simulation; Computer science; Economic dispatch; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001235666,0.0007889911,0.001042145,0.0004181161,0.0003396733,0.0006970539,0.0008707469,0.0008738043,0.001834368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001844959,0.0003657296,0.0005779928,0.0007538361,0.0004537193,0.0006792762,0.0005731311,0.001341396,0.0004857451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004535336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008339591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002411579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001307608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994398,0.0003120362,0.0000187758,0.00004670495,0.0001484627,0.00003419485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995827,0.0002644379,0.00004726509,0.00002317688,0.00006604966,0.00001637379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004748496,0.00004038064,0.0001770915,0.0001786911,0.00003666908,0.00007298488,0.00004225354,0.9357362,0.001488162,0.01806289,0.002086187,0.042031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001139098,0.00001837886,0.00002757604,0.000005824277,0.00000381602,0.00001173984,0.000003747415,0.9972284,0.0002082017,0.001687014,0.0007910448,0.000002813089],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003603613,0.000431825,0.9925074,0.0001625705,0.0000447981,0.00003776333,0.00002211396,0.00009151439,0.00309849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4094283,0.001581341,0.5819487,0.0002000968,0.0001984867,0.0004408191,0.0002595943,0.0001235256,0.005819133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002411579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006534874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007849771026057564,"score_gpt":0.2251284250195706,"score_spread":0.217278653993513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}