{"id":"W1976259764","doi":"10.4296/cwrj2801021","title":"Drought Contingency Planning and Implementation at the Local Level in Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Watershed; Local government; Environmental planning; Government (linguistics); Contingency plan; Business; Plan (archaeology); Watershed management; Environmental resource management; Agriculture; Contingency; Water resource management; Geography; Public administration; Political science; Environmental science; Management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001554838,0.0001208498,0.0001613152,0.0006564091,0.003277146,0.001157482,0.0006293482,0.0002041196,0.001605272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003805821,0.0001638876,0.0001613051,0.001253555,0.001023736,0.0004184146,0.001131519,0.0002944171,0.0001282688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04207469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04913825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9324593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987011,0.0002607774,0.00004034401,0.00009537981,0.0004041111,0.0004983203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969895,0.000385775,0.0002889433,0.00009624561,0.001114074,0.001125411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006675791,0.001309777,0.5256884,0.0004934444,0.0001028023,0.001339531,0.06368567,0.01642576,0.00814468,0.006772772,0.01225241,0.3631173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007905871,0.0005102932,0.8926546,0.00009317507,0.00005080869,0.00006534493,0.06227972,0.006081798,0.001905083,0.0009491402,0.0352763,0.0000546929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880053,0.0001437732,0.0005664129,0.0006764248,0.000006081106,0.0002005284,0.0001664103,0.00003306746,0.01020198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951427,0.0002041703,0.0009482201,0.00003783516,0.000002375787,0.00006581908,0.0001609606,0.000004886314,0.003433096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06754071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3052747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1309234761503444,"score_gpt":0.3655215050458314,"score_spread":0.234598028895487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}