{"id":"W1976362903","doi":"10.1007/s10704-010-9540-3","title":"On the Mode II Fatigue Threshold for Mild Steel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fracture","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Paris' law; Materials science; Residual stress; Mode (computer interface); Structural engineering; Ultimate tensile strength; Bar (unit); Crack closure; Composite material; Shear (geology); Shear stress; Residual; Fatigue testing; Fracture mechanics; Engineering; Mathematics; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003413863,0.0002556425,0.0003373659,0.0006942698,0.0002602782,0.0004591282,0.000545332,0.0006272786,0.003608773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001900193,0.0001782303,0.0002396055,0.0001832998,0.0004383447,0.0007063419,0.0005522243,0.0005523478,0.0006386269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004528907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002358582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003120967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001956803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998356,0.00001640861,0.00000607856,0.00003155539,0.00005678411,0.00005364416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993599,0.0003528565,0.00007455052,0.00003966423,0.0001379233,0.00003502259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001380703,0.000179468,0.01196409,0.0004886496,0.00003854392,0.0009599796,0.0007939679,0.09008785,0.6511925,0.1778236,0.005668386,0.05942214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005570331,0.0005803405,0.04736877,0.0002804142,0.0000562108,0.001220121,0.0009039956,0.6688262,0.1571664,0.1141123,0.009243802,0.0001857288],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8657907,0.002741738,0.08554611,0.0005598612,0.0001279925,0.00005245979,0.0002107278,0.0004551464,0.04451536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996172,0.0002135994,0.001304028,0.00005686907,0.00002552921,0.000009515718,0.00005086211,0.0000275935,0.002140106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003608773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0120725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01832692187576768,"score_gpt":0.2748848190025996,"score_spread":0.2565578971268319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}