{"id":"W1976497918","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01662.x","title":"Effects of marine reserve age on fish populations: a global meta‐analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Marine reserve; Nature reserve; Trophic cascade; Fishery; Marine protected area; Ecology; Fish mortality; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Trophic level; Habitat; Food web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01200468,0.002761516,0.006914792,0.003488546,0.0006574227,0.002170189,0.002634791,0.001809497,0.005767641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01883204,0.001033514,0.02628315,0.005963773,0.0008483944,0.001690654,0.001937484,0.002160043,0.0005115343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008465924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001177774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01072126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01424623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931239,0.00390698,0.0008289298,0.001555496,0.0003228165,0.0002617246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852635,0.01095594,0.001581365,0.001251699,0.0006279169,0.0003195844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00171354,0.00003395573,0.1107334,0.04226415,0.8250673,0.0003992568,0.0001781352,0.003937739,0.0008536498,0.000573722,0.003911849,0.01033325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003811022,0.0003059336,0.09369297,0.005488327,0.8900164,0.000207334,0.0001802358,0.003916332,0.0003819067,0.001363905,0.003989328,0.0000762169],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1961292,0.7604014,0.01560215,0.004031811,0.0009921537,0.000269606,0.01986088,0.0008970763,0.001815659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455395,0.04320561,0.00522921,0.001071887,0.0002187363,0.0003886648,0.003645556,0.0001739103,0.0005267876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06348753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02590565978289561,"score_gpt":0.290000064980154,"score_spread":0.2640944051972584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}