{"id":"W1976508675","doi":"10.1256/qj.05.101","title":"Evaluation of new estimates of background‐ and observation‐error covariances for variational assimilation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","topic":"Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences","keywords":"Covariance; Monte Carlo method; Radiosonde; Statistics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Mathematics; Data assimilation; Observational error; Algorithm; Meteorology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004552181,0.0006848018,0.0007724602,0.0005479734,0.0004214503,0.00111582,0.001155814,0.0006991709,0.000840197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01401352,0.0006515494,0.0005370739,0.0004119604,0.0004682285,0.001590506,0.0008965271,0.001259992,0.000153603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001618015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002222961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02040632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02318923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988368,0.0003860163,0.00005712101,0.0001273901,0.0005193812,0.00007320075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957319,0.002412743,0.0003321021,0.0002697868,0.001142832,0.0001105792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001140583,0.00006862357,0.003050745,0.00005425988,0.0001313061,0.00003614698,0.00004819148,0.9544265,0.005376995,0.006457929,0.0003733147,0.02986194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001225757,0.000009334298,0.0004829078,0.000004107445,0.000007853193,0.000004047874,0.000002391355,0.9976337,0.001281653,0.0003494748,0.0002042604,0.000007965757],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1029801,0.0001967632,0.893527,0.000197413,0.00009132737,0.00007435328,0.0001249804,0.0007145853,0.002093446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6764687,0.0001683733,0.3210503,0.00009008143,0.00007984259,0.0001395226,0.0004575142,0.0004501774,0.001095487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02040632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04057503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1200358176370136,"score_gpt":0.3100179938124902,"score_spread":0.1899821761754765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}