{"id":"W1976538075","doi":"10.1139/x05-023","title":"Additional results for perpendicular distance sampling","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sampling (signal processing); Perpendicular; Debris; Sample (material); Field (mathematics); Sampling error; Coarse woody debris; Statistics; Computer science; Environmental science; Soil science; Geology; Mathematics; Observational error; Geometry; Ecology; Physics; Habitat; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01478908,0.002361602,0.001511755,0.002491174,0.002101354,0.002028105,0.002196208,0.001208472,0.09556476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09275866,0.0006315759,0.003088046,0.003494597,0.0009006706,0.005444623,0.003001601,0.001869151,0.0167435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001257159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001754114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01454372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009962388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98179,0.006007184,0.001618566,0.002637901,0.006851485,0.001094945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9092948,0.04320935,0.00216063,0.0150895,0.02866572,0.001580015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004190863,0.001890264,0.05298454,0.002274885,0.0003405629,0.001005585,0.000906451,0.02818185,0.02776203,0.06681582,0.05894172,0.7547053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009313822,0.003250647,0.1206457,0.000882879,0.001515795,0.007674987,0.002969644,0.2551484,0.06419852,0.2158869,0.3262032,0.0006919435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04793229,0.002075776,0.8106509,0.002144656,0.001842697,0.001476621,0.009469969,0.002851846,0.1215552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.265211,0.002001772,0.6366709,0.001648847,0.001044545,0.001560034,0.02395214,0.001863881,0.0660469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09556476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3196959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08926778426345747,"score_gpt":0.2946003017003716,"score_spread":0.2053325174369141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}