{"id":"W1976626701","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.095","title":"An exergy–cost–energy–mass analysis of a hybrid copper–chlorine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","topic":"Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes","field":"Engineering","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Exergy; Thermochemical cycle; Process engineering; Hydrogen production; Environmental science; Exergy efficiency; Greenhouse gas; Capital cost; Chlorine; Hydrogen; Thermodynamics; Chemistry; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001512116,0.0002079835,0.0004487958,0.0003602002,0.00002619804,0.00002400087,0.0005869984,0.00007468827,0.00004416494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000918927,0.0001925549,0.0003998395,0.0003425532,0.00004871731,0.0002399319,0.00001655287,0.0001217981,5.33171e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001390679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003592602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001745564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003152378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983782,0.00001723516,0.0006876399,0.0002136797,0.0004791108,0.0002241759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988142,0.00006381857,0.0002644228,0.0002045758,0.0004923082,0.0001606228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001858334,0.0001783662,0.00003235726,0.000009009783,0.001524584,0.00001414146,0.0000272092,0.1523804,0.8340701,0.0005641052,0.0001804738,0.01083338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042484,0.00009311524,0.00001271427,0.00004405425,0.0003222605,0.00007124975,0.000009536882,0.05827845,0.932171,0.006644368,0.001740503,0.0001878862],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877474,0.000822856,0.01027074,0.0002435727,0.0002901135,0.00003619198,0.00003029155,0.00006605927,0.0004927382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982602,0.0002631875,0.0004994026,0.0001019089,0.0006911698,0.000009046083,0.0001151518,0.00003012156,0.00002983614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09810086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7852162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008069644169260272,"score_gpt":0.2445840196148932,"score_spread":0.2365143754456329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}