{"id":"W1976626701","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.095","title":"An exergy–cost–energy–mass analysis of a hybrid copper–chlorine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","topic":"Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes","field":"Engineering","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Exergy; Thermochemical cycle; Process engineering; Hydrogen production; Environmental science; Exergy efficiency; Greenhouse gas; Capital cost; Chlorine; Hydrogen; Thermodynamics; Chemistry; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003345037,0.000424172,0.0006014658,0.000934836,0.0005384986,0.0007759886,0.0006917854,0.000685236,0.003514144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004810886,0.0003333023,0.000677396,0.0005581148,0.0005254448,0.0006684038,0.0002958254,0.0003700629,0.0001627209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00184638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00104986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0280924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02529164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999224,0.00001346625,0.000002886569,0.000009392714,0.00002996875,0.00002199208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998467,0.00009472804,0.000009460485,0.000007592707,0.00003333999,0.000008117528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000927815,0.0001321451,0.002656304,0.0002233625,0.00008438343,0.0004302076,0.00005217462,0.9210165,0.05817619,0.004855,0.0002832385,0.01116268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005258531,0.000294792,0.002329718,0.000006349878,0.00004266114,0.00003867885,0.00004673557,0.9807429,0.01509729,0.001004405,0.0003282542,0.00001559436],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777941,0.000318321,0.0138471,0.00009585022,0.00001520384,0.00007485761,0.0001777157,0.00006075617,0.007616015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983484,0.00003850701,0.0004841812,0.000004956604,0.000001022964,0.00001129029,0.00002490592,0.000006770088,0.001079961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0280924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05585772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008069644169260272,"score_gpt":0.2445840196148932,"score_spread":0.2365143754456329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}