{"id":"W1976629859","doi":"10.1139/l05-101","title":"Comparison of frequency- and time-domain analyses for guyed masts in turbulent winds","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Vibration and Dynamic Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Frequency domain; Time domain; Mast (botany); Finite element method; Nonlinear system; Turbulence; Structural engineering; Frequency response; Response analysis; Engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Mechanics; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002535545,0.0002007643,0.0001506223,0.0005602217,0.0001500201,0.0001889775,0.000184035,0.00025693,0.001237744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006324581,0.00009372221,0.0003226403,0.0002246392,0.0001980539,0.000223785,0.0001236791,0.0001306871,0.0001881181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000129653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001314127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001232423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001704058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999381,0.00001286115,0.000003729796,0.000008297231,0.0000290243,0.000008103983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996367,0.000209983,0.0000324501,0.00002464214,0.0000837718,0.00001246936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006300209,0.0001186108,0.02269456,0.0002545687,0.0000484027,0.0004726931,0.0004861064,0.7142455,0.192241,0.002272104,0.0004030661,0.06613334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002628039,0.0002020118,0.02505435,0.00001747209,0.0000213707,0.0001923432,0.0003011842,0.9444351,0.02827721,0.0005459107,0.0009021023,0.00002447036],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8949847,0.00008588762,0.1024244,0.0000294707,0.000008358924,0.00001755751,0.00008674429,0.0001457063,0.002217315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901136,0.00006322587,0.008996834,0.000004052938,0.000002017706,0.000009542804,0.00008735921,0.00001202065,0.0007112708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001237744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004140675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01132933414610355,"score_gpt":0.2336636527226127,"score_spread":0.2223343185765091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}