{"id":"W1976640313","doi":"10.1509/jmkr.47.2.274","title":"The Effect of Experiential Analogies on Consumer Perceptions and Attitudes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marketing Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Moderation; Psychology; Experiential learning; Product (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Perception; Preference; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Product category; Consumer behaviour; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01038068,0.00006851423,0.0001231145,0.0003183825,0.0004854616,0.0003653354,0.0002373911,0.00004349165,0.0002866854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003799958,0.00004255224,0.00007267061,0.000206753,0.0003835093,0.0002553278,0.0001004883,0.0005321954,0.00002403889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000955155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002122191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003162153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005751145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987307,0.000179468,0.0002969085,0.00009953043,0.0005172075,0.000176201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971979,0.001872977,0.0002113299,0.0001711962,0.0005315991,0.00001506079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001429405,0.00006379923,0.5221576,0.000126684,0.00004104346,0.000004170949,0.00006642384,7.199292e-7,0.04928603,0.000613683,0.005994569,0.4202158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004675211,0.00002556174,0.9731851,0.00007563346,0.00002973549,0.000008875022,0.0003895863,0.00003052052,0.0003388223,0.00004446135,0.02535128,0.00005286136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977434,0.0001562645,0.000003060533,0.000515369,0.0004549505,0.0001118963,5.19375e-7,0.000007135347,0.001007351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993421,0.0001737436,0.00002498449,0.00000970953,0.0002616962,0.000007434269,7.36308e-7,0.000007210828,0.0001723592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4510275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4549179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03774032987289892,"score_gpt":0.3633285879408136,"score_spread":0.3255882580679146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}