{"id":"W1976663592","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou060","title":"An egalitarian defense of proportionality-based balancing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01889184,0.0007607221,0.0009026538,0.001693547,0.004313936,0.007864051,0.003505642,0.005946966,0.00708024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0236171,0.0005597183,0.001279881,0.001195725,0.03619549,0.01392577,0.00823014,0.01042491,0.001514281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004917794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001997581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00128496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9770314,0.009122941,0.0008404971,0.004350261,0.007118901,0.00153595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929522,0.002930119,0.0006993826,0.001749157,0.001337627,0.0003316529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001900592,0.000001715134,0.00001363705,0.00000351443,0.000001401804,0.000004058159,0.0001135961,0.00007568416,0.00002116063,0.9989197,0.0002375777,0.0006061553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006692602,0.000005305322,0.00002361942,0.00001364516,0.000002579286,0.00001592867,0.00004721724,0.0004805906,0.0001129496,0.990504,0.008781883,0.000005635187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01628204,0.001367041,0.4239292,0.0470761,0.001166139,0.0001808524,0.0001113988,0.0002136151,0.5096736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8649884,0.0008560919,0.07073466,0.01871527,0.001353481,0.0009062635,0.00007744245,0.0002587641,0.04210956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01889184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0999108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03498108306966285,"score_gpt":0.3633691857699051,"score_spread":0.3283881027002423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}