{"id":"W1976719689","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000018","title":"The psychological advantage of unfalsifiability: The appeal of untestable religious and political ideologies.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Falsifiability; Social psychology; Politics; Conviction; Offensive; Psychology; Epistemology; Ideology; Irrational number; Function (biology); Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004658493,0.0001220635,0.0004812998,0.00004404239,0.000607973,0.00002618267,0.0004406724,0.0003049285,0.00004407843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001212036,0.00007157283,0.0002002418,0.0001636734,0.006363315,0.0000831064,0.00006223677,0.0004816792,0.000001007015],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002967856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005371418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003860891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002552454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967524,0.001619451,0.0006777678,0.0001980908,0.000332665,0.0004196592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997236,0.001677675,0.000547671,0.0001492381,0.0002815284,0.0001078515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006695686,0.0003647511,0.07842293,0.0000334036,0.000131774,0.000003865586,0.02453359,1.067539e-7,0.0006937454,0.8679574,0.006056272,0.02113257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001401996,0.001406327,0.5277338,0.00002212435,0.00008917291,0.00008809435,0.05003332,0.000003139638,0.00001848843,0.3533582,0.0656719,0.0001734251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9297602,0.0008254306,0.0001579956,0.05426879,0.0006646162,0.0001121758,0.000007599346,0.000007802669,0.01419544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962767,0.0009040646,0.00008607174,0.002072789,0.0005927991,0.000002289817,3.825666e-7,0.000005758384,0.00005913216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5145992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04031234095082667,"score_gpt":0.4044068336571068,"score_spread":0.3640944927062801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}