{"id":"W1976795862","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.009","title":"Collaborative inquiry in teacher professional development","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching and Teacher Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":320,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Johns Hopkins University; American Educational Research Association","keywords":"Situated; Professional learning community; Pedagogy; Professional development; Reading (process); Faculty development; Mathematics education; Community of practice; Teacher education; Community of inquiry; Psychology; Computer science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009119715,0.0002900361,0.0006333674,0.0015304,0.004050491,0.007780662,0.001379822,0.003609407,0.007047527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02506007,0.0003558095,0.0003459159,0.001910555,0.01439669,0.008430945,0.003701546,0.002925837,0.0005427093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003432082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005928047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004556944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003874767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893346,0.008592566,0.0002421854,0.0004456136,0.0009959502,0.0003890774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448693,0.05096938,0.0006229069,0.00143125,0.001014174,0.001092974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006796194,0.0002296399,0.00130089,0.0003045172,0.00001433792,0.0002349803,0.03781392,0.000826466,0.0001164538,0.8298761,0.005794358,0.1234203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001434178,0.000138863,0.002619099,0.0006844135,0.00003912114,0.0007979741,0.03889466,0.003683362,0.0004511065,0.8271819,0.1253338,0.00003232477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.117615,0.06569438,0.1345691,0.0354073,0.001689647,0.0002777434,0.00005235678,0.0001652381,0.6445292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427275,0.008104105,0.02079427,0.0005369391,0.0003102117,0.000313492,0.00002690644,0.00004488243,0.02714172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009119715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04823029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05157037438511956,"score_gpt":0.4395006380303246,"score_spread":0.387930263645205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}