{"id":"W1976865627","doi":"10.1139/x03-266","title":"Accuracy of partially visually assessed stand characteristics: a case study of Finnish forest inventory by compartments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Variance (accounting); Basal area; Forest inventory; Sample (material); Technician; Tree (set theory); Regression analysis; Mathematics; Forest management; Computer science; Forestry; Geography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001774246,0.0001394132,0.0003516396,0.0003128515,0.000251755,0.00004680266,0.0005759825,0.00007752769,0.0005306853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004131614,0.0001291604,0.00007155749,0.0003949508,0.0006598525,0.0003073101,0.00012169,0.0003972319,0.00002132723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005565736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009766251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04726772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5735786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975743,0.0002404933,0.0007255627,0.0001974799,0.0006935071,0.0005686893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982632,0.0001487084,0.000445108,0.0003028877,0.0001874552,0.0006525773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009892467,0.0008628279,0.9821624,0.00004833319,0.0001159235,0.004976906,0.00176412,0.002581952,0.000132131,0.0003865431,0.006469022,0.0004009111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003065907,0.004101179,0.9824508,0.0001080091,0.00005350576,0.0003066457,0.003091369,0.0000950252,0.0002090443,0.001731919,0.00461134,0.0001752378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983844,0.00009237961,0.0001166498,0.0001324259,0.0001366675,0.0005617835,0.00003195819,0.000002279121,0.0005415055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999702,0.00002317567,0.00005975174,0.00002988024,0.00003070373,0.00001414803,0.000005757539,0.000015234,0.0001193902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5263109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9590766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05173416010042536,"score_gpt":0.3446218840329096,"score_spread":0.2928877239324842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}