{"id":"W1976865627","doi":"10.1139/x03-266","title":"Accuracy of partially visually assessed stand characteristics: a case study of Finnish forest inventory by compartments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Variance (accounting); Basal area; Forest inventory; Sample (material); Technician; Tree (set theory); Regression analysis; Mathematics; Forest management; Computer science; Forestry; Geography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104809,0.0004684808,0.0005767483,0.001336484,0.0008757205,0.001348038,0.001255259,0.0008311222,0.0005540721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04093112,0.0002675251,0.0006218383,0.001970853,0.0009469859,0.001174093,0.000904255,0.0003414014,0.0001510297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00190478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009981019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07623512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09800665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933119,0.003527574,0.0005062466,0.0009535734,0.001264745,0.0004359272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9534491,0.03629152,0.003133541,0.003353083,0.003421739,0.0003510409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008180998,0.0002200981,0.9095428,0.0002297269,0.0003444274,0.002047833,0.01486848,0.01551656,0.001401687,0.0006915649,0.0004353186,0.05388347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004014223,0.0004842666,0.9364199,0.0001471687,0.0002616906,0.001495544,0.01016578,0.04405343,0.003746481,0.0009927299,0.002081372,0.0001115701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981945,0.0001059736,0.001067273,0.00002240793,0.000002404275,0.00001479817,0.0001561526,0.000009003802,0.0004275266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974941,0.00003953071,0.001988508,0.000006841714,0.00000295347,0.0000115755,0.0002761757,0.00000672127,0.0001736536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07623512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1515828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05173416010042536,"score_gpt":0.3446218840329096,"score_spread":0.2928877239324842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}