{"id":"W1977009042","doi":"10.1063/1.4731342","title":"Assessment of the PW86+PBE+XDM density functional on van der Waals complexes at non-equilibrium geometries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Advanced Chemical Physics Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts; Dalhousie University","keywords":"van der Waals force; Density functional theory; Thermochemistry; London dispersion force; Dispersion (optics); Thermodynamics; Chemistry; Physics; Computational chemistry; Statistical physics; Molecule; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007892313,0.00154221,0.002189049,0.001505683,0.001455839,0.001428716,0.003549522,0.001905896,0.003345218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01280576,0.0005145411,0.0009451222,0.001582706,0.0005924171,0.002096721,0.001718694,0.002013194,0.0009993816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001199852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002190335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01090663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007681226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973386,0.001320291,0.0001289707,0.000133169,0.0008937274,0.0001851935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949802,0.002804675,0.0001695122,0.0004163488,0.001449859,0.0001794058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009416828,0.000453631,0.006602966,0.001946582,0.0003580801,0.0007999004,0.000575906,0.854073,0.0100579,0.06107278,0.01661397,0.04650363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006706284,0.0001956578,0.0009216776,0.00009200507,0.00002638411,0.00006816039,0.0001114867,0.9872862,0.004348383,0.004087013,0.002756504,0.00003962138],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7297245,0.01123669,0.2160271,0.002535374,0.0004702578,0.0005843434,0.005282153,0.003959664,0.03017994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8456165,0.002814237,0.1405532,0.0004685209,0.00009449406,0.0007607125,0.005882157,0.001741402,0.00206879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01090663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04173905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02124860020932798,"score_gpt":0.2771286214450587,"score_spread":0.2558800212357307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}