{"id":"W1977027027","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003","title":"The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":804,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Psychology; Variance (accounting); Meta-analysis; Context (archaeology); Association (psychology); External validity; Social psychology; Intervention (counseling); Clinical psychology; Psychotherapist; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03956499,0.001893793,0.008537729,0.00518608,0.0006508724,0.003678605,0.003105211,0.001881722,0.001278813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0988664,0.00145386,0.01303329,0.005930834,0.001817817,0.002398477,0.001850962,0.001682912,0.0001836108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001985558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00316793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005815977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0126429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9792398,0.008027735,0.005716742,0.003241293,0.003546341,0.000228076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8718933,0.109325,0.009280892,0.003683897,0.005435321,0.0003816873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001620139,0.0001854194,0.1169229,0.2368497,0.4794049,0.0001582658,0.0008673468,0.0007434466,0.0005690858,0.0008932538,0.001795867,0.1599898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005116698,0.0007669014,0.1226674,0.06033774,0.7988108,0.0006519569,0.0009497784,0.0007659979,0.0009454524,0.001635104,0.01174529,0.0002118941],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01181317,0.9862363,0.0009562917,0.0002066949,0.0001716004,0.00008720427,0.0002854125,0.00001091149,0.0002324613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2124102,0.778424,0.006240006,0.001039576,0.0003150975,0.0003151862,0.0010186,0.0000411758,0.0001961221],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.960435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2092421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1305977223200034,"score_gpt":0.4131045731942908,"score_spread":0.2825068508742874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}