{"id":"W1977083222","doi":"10.1002/pamm.200700208","title":"Towards explicit evaluation of pharmacokinetic outcomes of patient drug intake behaviour","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PAMM","topic":"Medication Adherence and Compliance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Pharmacokinetics; Drug; Formalism (music); Compromise; Medicine; Probabilistic logic; Pharmacology; Patient compliance; Drug administration; Compliance (psychology); Intensive care medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Psychology; Emergency medicine; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00548791,0.0005458528,0.0006630831,0.0006995125,0.0002960968,0.002067516,0.0008891734,0.0008941947,0.001253972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02688536,0.0003833327,0.0006699354,0.0006606501,0.001008988,0.002182284,0.001336786,0.001235508,0.000234371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001134067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001412613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003994558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001848411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965928,0.002189973,0.0001468296,0.0003306397,0.0006122297,0.000127472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912532,0.005390604,0.001396546,0.0008870024,0.00089447,0.0001781572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000316023,0.0004660492,0.03308109,0.00036832,0.0002372077,0.0005210015,0.001017119,0.6768724,0.01251405,0.1830939,0.001421902,0.09009098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007785097,0.00003513872,0.002199657,0.00001481116,0.00001261683,0.0000269756,0.00002257112,0.9635475,0.001566869,0.03226896,0.0002837887,0.00001334089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1032889,0.0001110464,0.8930775,0.0003422684,0.00001860147,0.000068544,0.0002378069,0.000557903,0.002297402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9260852,0.00009729085,0.07280262,0.00005872996,0.00001843398,0.0001054422,0.0001524301,0.00005508189,0.000624788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00548791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02902317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06425867558741254,"score_gpt":0.3865655143671679,"score_spread":0.3223068387797553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}