{"id":"W1977083222","doi":"10.1002/pamm.200700208","title":"Towards explicit evaluation of pharmacokinetic outcomes of patient drug intake behaviour","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PAMM","topic":"Medication Adherence and Compliance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Pharmacokinetics; Drug; Formalism (music); Compromise; Medicine; Probabilistic logic; Pharmacology; Patient compliance; Drug administration; Compliance (psychology); Intensive care medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Psychology; Emergency medicine; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006457382,0.00006775263,0.000189612,0.00007220468,0.00001054748,0.000001084226,0.00006552765,0.00002512176,0.001730455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001298661,0.00005481264,0.00005373962,0.0001360336,0.00002986408,0.00002383437,0.00001617417,0.00006642932,0.00006057197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003394635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009337338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007077261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003135543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987072,0.00002871723,0.0003652895,0.0001091796,0.0006849779,0.0001046466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991693,0.00003087713,0.0001810165,0.0002051656,0.000338082,0.00007556285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009467887,0.0005378526,0.5414626,0.0001067109,0.00006451417,0.000003951503,0.001842377,0.000008551495,0.01794028,0.0002697925,0.002258473,0.4354102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001423691,0.0001120849,0.86559,0.00008954352,0.0002179942,0.00000465956,0.0008137945,0.0003225305,0.1304545,0.0001439687,0.000763614,0.0000635848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990208,0.0002279105,0.000445973,0.0003737896,0.0001466653,0.0003738885,0.000002973907,0.0000127101,0.008208053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998676,0.00001752868,0.0005198873,0.0002791666,0.00002629879,0.00002674143,0.00001196267,0.000005972119,0.0004364438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4353466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06425867558741254,"score_gpt":0.3865655143671679,"score_spread":0.3223068387797553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}