{"id":"W1977108564","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009","title":"Validating walkability indices: How do different households respond to the walkability of their neighborhood?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":345,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Walkability; TRIPS architecture; Index (typography); Geography; Transport engineering; Correlation; Built environment; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00438691,0.000308312,0.000450635,0.0001244313,0.0009268903,0.00005251932,0.0006600603,0.0001986606,0.001325843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003405428,0.0002144892,0.0002076835,0.0005011808,0.001513237,0.000399675,0.00001463354,0.0005174083,0.000008668595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001178316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001339481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003275007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01344733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956112,0.0005554209,0.0007339765,0.0008240047,0.001460449,0.0008149504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998172,0.0003209713,0.0001600216,0.0007540163,0.000107411,0.0004856209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002816389,0.0004562955,0.9209765,0.0001063489,0.00004702978,0.000006291983,0.07210124,0.0000144854,0.0002895047,0.001197285,0.00003351867,0.004489825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003805749,0.0001951247,0.9743088,0.00004822767,0.00005202969,5.761701e-8,0.009609533,0.000003850241,0.002090564,0.002432663,0.0106402,0.0002383623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938101,0.0002041326,0.0006414925,0.001978218,0.0001032346,0.00155352,0.0002926911,0.00006068304,0.001355916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986034,0.0005066751,0.000169091,0.00004406268,0.00009272001,0.0002255753,0.00008548951,0.00002829743,0.0002446981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06249171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1218175577041744,"score_gpt":0.3223829198972372,"score_spread":0.2005653621930628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}