{"id":"W1977167323","doi":"10.1097/00000542-200201000-00034","title":"Economic Evaluation of Propofol for Sedation of Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anesthesiology","topic":"Anesthesia and Sedative Agents","field":"Medicine","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes; St. Paul's Hospital; University of British Columbia; Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Providence Health Care","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Propofol; Sedation; Midazolam; Sedative; Intensive care unit; Anesthesia; Emergency medicine; Intensive care; Regimen; Randomized controlled trial; Intensive care medicine; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001412577,0.00008940279,0.000297885,0.0001222907,0.00002163975,8.665454e-7,0.00005844274,0.00009030787,0.0001813526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005888834,0.00007572844,0.0000459098,0.00009265162,0.00004978698,0.00003454142,0.000009868786,0.00003300412,0.00003653101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006740068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007592246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002281295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008072358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992111,0.0001057894,0.00027695,0.0001719856,0.000116487,0.0001176377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968888,0.00008065158,0.0001647494,0.000171375,0.002645001,0.00004940009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006468227,0.0001030566,0.9566709,0.0001484978,0.00007575344,0.000002193377,0.009173838,0.0001024017,0.001518199,0.0001965457,0.002114601,0.02924713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002564698,0.003529369,0.974959,0.00005621481,0.0002487715,0.000006780854,0.003242521,0.001507287,0.01169699,0.00007147722,0.002015439,0.000101497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981955,0.00007783261,0.00002203514,0.000154459,0.00004144576,0.001352708,0.0000127219,0.000008176949,0.0001351441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987564,0.000007064952,0.0001549371,0.0006530955,0.00002578801,0.0000748825,0.0002510845,0.00001222063,0.00006454527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02914563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3088116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08038471261048344,"score_gpt":0.3202505833798805,"score_spread":0.2398658707693971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}