{"id":"W1977195780","doi":"10.1002/cjas.105","title":"Diversity management versus gender equality: the finnish case","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Liikesivistysrahasto; Foundation for Economic Education","keywords":"Diversity management; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Power (physics); Gender diversity; Gender studies; Gender equality; Political science; Public relations; Management; Geography; Anthropology; Economics; Corporate governance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008086914,0.0002162013,0.000251546,0.0003697748,0.01790782,0.0006852351,0.001580948,0.0001253056,0.0002351764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007964688,0.0001875498,0.0001787678,0.001678259,0.007513539,0.001324857,0.0000692581,0.0003197269,0.000006184393],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001278429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006454139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03513229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.784712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996635,0.0007380315,0.0005197639,0.000425599,0.000525631,0.001155939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970151,0.000308207,0.0005012745,0.0002151569,0.0004640936,0.001496175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001151872,0.00009460831,0.01776098,0.00003731462,0.00008666849,0.00572336,0.3182178,0.0003643808,0.00001530072,0.650161,0.001397525,0.006025842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001322431,0.007730467,0.05918716,0.0001538479,0.00032598,0.004316683,0.7684116,0.0003265341,0.0001709349,0.136902,0.02007458,0.00107784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9057804,0.0001781113,0.0006601855,0.005781753,0.0009430178,0.0002655579,0.00003866938,0.00001381329,0.08633851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965907,0.00004517144,0.002100507,0.0006442568,0.0002606499,0.000001654924,0.000001699966,0.00000342446,0.0003518944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7495797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3704268692731694,"score_gpt":0.3766041096206736,"score_spread":0.00617724034750422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}