{"id":"W1977195780","doi":"10.1002/cjas.105","title":"Diversity management versus gender equality: the finnish case","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Liikesivistysrahasto; Foundation for Economic Education","keywords":"Diversity management; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Power (physics); Gender diversity; Gender studies; Gender equality; Political science; Public relations; Management; Geography; Anthropology; Economics; Corporate governance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00347266,0.0004174684,0.0004373907,0.001715131,0.02382018,0.005506443,0.001083204,0.003805497,0.005130366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005284226,0.0002295242,0.0003675366,0.002369851,0.01439068,0.00314899,0.007329672,0.002121984,0.0003011057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01144311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005828997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07665014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09334857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953896,0.001946704,0.0001218856,0.0003082198,0.0007441378,0.001489455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629,0.002387322,0.0003687617,0.000133434,0.0001821314,0.0006383801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001595981,0.0002909918,0.04030503,0.0001964633,0.00003003548,0.05378137,0.5694143,0.0008779533,0.0006925281,0.3081621,0.006618569,0.01947114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005311735,0.00009792097,0.01949488,0.0007254975,0.00004785915,0.01101587,0.8497315,0.001083208,0.0005857758,0.03305515,0.08402365,0.00008555518],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8467985,0.001347432,0.0007645011,0.007899324,0.0001090253,0.0000406968,0.00006444781,0.000004841692,0.1429711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996609,0.0003745386,0.0001328573,0.0004109363,0.00002462957,0.00002037188,0.0000111593,0.000001497045,0.002415109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07665014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.152408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3704268692731694,"score_gpt":0.3766041096206736,"score_spread":0.00617724034750422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}