{"id":"W1977231334","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2011.09.026","title":"Comparison of reversed-phase and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography for the separation of ephedrines","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chromatography A","topic":"Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"World Anti-Doping Agency","keywords":"Chemistry; Hydrophilic interaction chromatography; Chromatography; Ephedrine; Pseudoephedrine; Phenylpropanolamine; Selectivity; Lipophilicity; Phase (matter); High-performance liquid chromatography; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003012292,0.0002426725,0.0006863558,0.00029705,0.0001073935,0.00001749049,0.0003326439,0.0001648043,0.0002589466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006759416,0.0001761778,0.0008441575,0.0005357597,0.0004745212,0.0002678758,0.00003772025,0.0002501117,3.207026e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009399033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004061863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001144859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002962473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979749,0.00002882142,0.001253904,0.0001843484,0.0003501784,0.0002078542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972222,0.0003042714,0.001651082,0.0003167799,0.0003740388,0.0001316468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003987894,0.002500018,0.04259182,0.002392018,0.002330253,0.00001152745,0.002950142,0.00002957797,0.9384657,0.001123534,0.001717099,0.001900445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002590306,0.001237293,0.001525011,0.000528835,0.0008538636,0.0001770167,0.002869872,0.0009196381,0.9856817,0.0007017723,0.002663741,0.0002509197],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935729,0.001940261,0.001566136,0.00004539111,0.00009978926,0.0001149834,0.00003553347,0.00001821589,0.002606828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985884,0.0003325415,0.0008935222,0.00001468922,0.0001226317,0.00001009069,0.000007764302,0.0000207864,0.000009562015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04721606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7184323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04277730543736017,"score_gpt":0.3474356719831943,"score_spread":0.3046583665458341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}