{"id":"W1977284482","doi":"10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05433.x","title":"Use and misuse of cost-effectiveness terminology in the gastroenterology literature: a systematic review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Medicine; Psychological intervention; Systematic review; Cost effectiveness; MEDLINE; Cost–benefit analysis; Economic evaluation; Evidence-based medicine; Actuarial science; Intensive care medicine; Alternative medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Pathology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.214457,0.002192943,0.01178911,0.03883763,0.001681822,0.01065419,0.003430365,0.004634013,0.001355795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.526256,0.002348669,0.008693679,0.03426649,0.006308993,0.01141575,0.004666739,0.002972527,0.0002431691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01337004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02555775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00612373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01508718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6455066,0.1820358,0.1209516,0.007996166,0.04201485,0.001494957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.375654,0.4981102,0.08704504,0.007941806,0.03026528,0.0009837627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004100782,0.00002344803,0.00479803,0.8723194,0.01512894,0.0002432491,0.001679171,0.0004225058,0.0003370814,0.002896218,0.002442612,0.09929935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003523326,0.000165215,0.006869144,0.9482201,0.0289143,0.0005561429,0.001149737,0.0005197331,0.00028682,0.002677342,0.01018985,0.00009936311],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001828893,0.9930228,0.001382267,0.002237535,0.0003942591,0.0006799151,0.0001520959,0.00001379166,0.0002884017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08270587,0.8925831,0.01508748,0.004173359,0.0006011141,0.004392687,0.0002750786,0.00004376341,0.0001375219],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.785543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3275237291107542,"score_gpt":0.4440298268689868,"score_spread":0.1165060977582326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}