{"id":"W1977287230","doi":"10.1577/1548-8446(2006)31[61:fhqsav]2.0.co;2","title":"Feature: Fish Habitat - Quantifying submerged aquatic vegetation using aerial photograph interpretation: Application in studies assessing fish habitat in freshwater ecosystems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Aerial photography; Aquatic ecosystem; Watershed; Resource (disambiguation); Ecosystem; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Aquatic plant; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Geography; Remote sensing; Biology; Computer science; Macrophyte","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003024263,0.0004243297,0.0002411958,0.003826108,0.0008307263,0.0008930754,0.0006610699,0.0003746908,0.003739491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005025218,0.0002952756,0.0003348045,0.00426473,0.0005994044,0.0008366813,0.0009064052,0.0003553808,0.0009090746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001006016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001066896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02592406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1096259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987943,0.000310033,0.000171535,0.0001522665,0.0005278126,0.00004395446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972351,0.0006386267,0.000482477,0.0004450896,0.001110874,0.00008773483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002321934,0.0001089507,0.2852028,0.001426275,0.00008132082,0.0004025644,0.004144885,0.001299126,0.02880294,0.001603457,0.007325607,0.6693699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003600174,0.0003430588,0.9516113,0.0002176881,0.00009605695,0.001000102,0.002756421,0.005279708,0.01518681,0.0009694739,0.0224273,0.0000762104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5796341,0.001461126,0.3013375,0.0007606371,0.0001455107,0.01076647,0.01731869,0.002532051,0.08604396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4700816,0.001210687,0.5158477,0.0001035519,0.0000495749,0.003536373,0.002432668,0.0002041979,0.006533686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02592406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05154634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02463055892834329,"score_gpt":0.2660049905246248,"score_spread":0.2413744315962815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}