{"id":"W1977287230","doi":"10.1577/1548-8446(2006)31[61:fhqsav]2.0.co;2","title":"Feature: Fish Habitat - Quantifying submerged aquatic vegetation using aerial photograph interpretation: Application in studies assessing fish habitat in freshwater ecosystems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Aerial photography; Aquatic ecosystem; Watershed; Resource (disambiguation); Ecosystem; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Aquatic plant; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Geography; Remote sensing; Biology; Computer science; Macrophyte","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005808176,0.0002440343,0.0003657395,0.0001441362,0.0002812315,0.0001242687,0.0001629891,0.0001172937,0.00004378721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001364744,0.0002450689,0.00006021923,0.0005906747,0.0002615817,0.001105731,0.0001606388,0.0001744841,0.00002092735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003398565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008855487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001829545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7845507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982259,0.0002349418,0.0004520749,0.0004710684,0.0002301988,0.0003858513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994043,0.0001504951,0.0002152449,0.000190101,0.00001647122,0.00002335763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000496555,0.00006932357,0.9812176,0.0001211872,0.00002831174,0.00001058417,0.001220522,0.002054731,0.001248798,0.00001921012,0.01377354,0.0001865763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000654866,0.00003240403,0.977203,0.000146231,0.00003423767,0.00000254147,0.001736864,0.01679632,0.0002997004,0.0007707211,0.002015287,0.0003077961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952731,0.00009220364,0.0006566458,0.001646943,0.0005967945,0.0006386678,0.000004690414,0.00006720642,0.001023724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973931,0.00003060848,0.001671036,0.0003800763,0.0000699825,0.000294175,0.00006680917,0.00002204038,0.00007212081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7827212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02463055892834329,"score_gpt":0.2660049905246248,"score_spread":0.2413744315962815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}