{"id":"W1977321725","doi":"10.3897/zookeys.20.84","title":"Revision of the genus Philoplitis Nixon (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ZooKeys","topic":"Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Braconidae; Fern; Genus; Context (archaeology); Biology; Zoology; Hymenoptera; Phylogenetic tree; Ecology; Parasitoid; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008689264,0.0007903098,0.000773236,0.001327346,0.001551376,0.001908111,0.001344394,0.0006959447,0.005800483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001724398,0.0001878798,0.000274579,0.000888204,0.001834048,0.002400805,0.001458189,0.001418986,0.001771208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000998911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001711611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004012109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009003896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994971,0.000121488,0.00009606157,0.00008829567,0.0001543428,0.00004285593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992821,0.0001050365,0.000152188,0.00007599439,0.0002877167,0.00009695316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002854533,0.0000968001,0.02085417,0.001967653,0.00007933558,0.002408401,0.006815984,0.0004793619,0.009072613,0.0181321,0.06457528,0.8752329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001812087,0.000227443,0.04244308,0.001370269,0.00009309129,0.005193523,0.002006475,0.0003955371,0.0004746187,0.003051326,0.9446896,0.00003691654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3371372,0.2801333,0.03082744,0.03009442,0.05732913,0.0008592666,0.003309004,0.001961757,0.2583484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7537933,0.1133586,0.04657944,0.007583368,0.01129555,0.0006544738,0.005049019,0.000323044,0.06136319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005800483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01940453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01384396337942914,"score_gpt":0.2022632016821301,"score_spread":0.1884192383027009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}