{"id":"W1977325000","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.03.005","title":"Probabilistic ecological risk assessment of copper in Chinese offshore marine environments from 2005 to 2012","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Pollution Bulletin","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Hazard quotient; Environmental science; Estuary; Submarine pipeline; Risk assessment; China; Probabilistic risk assessment; Hazard; Environmental monitoring; Hazard analysis; Environmental protection; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Oceanography; Environmental engineering; Biology; Engineering; Computer science; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007673758,0.0002740463,0.000403903,0.00008683436,0.00008384661,0.00001035353,0.0003232329,0.0002372472,0.06447717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000225128,0.0002411576,0.00007021249,0.000206983,0.0003591662,0.00008393634,0.001565631,0.0003434964,0.002398701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009129485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001635497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009758664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00374386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976765,0.0003456568,0.0005429035,0.0005776014,0.0003398208,0.0005175347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989867,0.0001008501,0.0001887343,0.0003857432,0.000002744672,0.0003352904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001446336,0.00128577,0.9615494,0.000002657787,0.00001666859,0.00001929871,0.00005896229,0.01720292,0.001554678,0.0000396517,0.01635079,0.001774571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001240589,0.0003892888,0.9351762,0.000003363047,0.00001877007,0.000006410501,0.00003174382,0.0007094651,0.0001566795,0.001557797,0.06047915,0.0002305665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647003,0.0000108825,0.0001071257,0.00300377,0.000195554,0.0006409978,0.00005883716,0.00002304335,0.03125948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875494,0.00003854346,0.005969258,0.0009155077,0.00005435892,0.0001407961,0.00007913049,0.00001952967,0.005233441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06207847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01055948047542741,"score_gpt":0.2475721508637272,"score_spread":0.2370126703882998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}