{"id":"W1977343735","doi":"10.1118/1.2898139","title":"Calculation of the replacement correction factors for ion chambers in megavoltage beams by Monte Carlo simulation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Dosimetry; Ionization chamber; Physics; Beam (structure); Photon; Absorbed dose; Electron; Cathode ray; Computational physics; Nuclear physics; Optics; Atomic physics; Nuclear medicine; Ion; Mathematics; Radiation; Statistics; Ionization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003547696,0.0007998366,0.0008469368,0.001463083,0.0007110996,0.00123547,0.001998298,0.0009704799,0.002657052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01110327,0.00081435,0.00085855,0.001234918,0.0003627934,0.001146737,0.000726646,0.0007597951,0.00105275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001550191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001405722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003781318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004935196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981079,0.00053792,0.00008959472,0.0001262111,0.001046653,0.00009165285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958497,0.002396139,0.0004146814,0.000461028,0.0008037451,0.0000747536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002221611,0.0000441341,0.006114047,0.0002538246,0.000125951,0.0001830391,0.000295445,0.8402199,0.00945763,0.02990529,0.001563676,0.1116149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003041113,0.00005249053,0.000941204,0.00005419912,0.0000446202,0.0002034677,0.00003591984,0.9746425,0.01219139,0.00391077,0.007837773,0.00005538028],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0256571,0.0004063302,0.9670731,0.00005205298,0.00004824777,0.0001011993,0.00009146026,0.001439505,0.005130921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3372473,0.0005878626,0.6560224,0.00008933609,0.00002896973,0.0003262838,0.0003186707,0.001431877,0.003947272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003781318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01876223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01307847956223804,"score_gpt":0.2831636637146735,"score_spread":0.2700851841524354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}