{"id":"W1977482354","doi":"10.1016/j.euromechflu.2007.01.002","title":"An improved method for calculation of interface pressure force in PLIC-VOF methods","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer","field":"Engineering","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Volume of fluid method; Surface tension; Mechanics; Maximum bubble pressure method; Bubble; Jump; Free surface; Drop (telecommunication); Spurious relationship; Interface (matter); Materials science; Simulation; Computer science; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00736876,0.0001891814,0.0004145454,0.0002832996,0.00002769702,0.0000243685,0.0003365077,0.00007773384,0.00001362592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008087657,0.0001801294,0.0001852033,0.0001895015,0.000008163252,0.0002027043,0.0000218033,0.0003374525,7.180274e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005262554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002149053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004550117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001246564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980839,0.0002915619,0.001013783,0.0001512925,0.0001735572,0.0002858636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991412,0.000164532,0.00009868081,0.0002396198,0.0002188033,0.0001371906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001704667,0.00004727712,0.000008230411,0.0001280642,0.0001051537,0.000009284343,0.0007427149,0.06733704,0.8948,0.005222694,0.00005154017,0.03137753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001146444,0.000615057,0.0002624643,0.00009398226,0.00009254705,0.00002776955,0.00007808237,0.8778979,0.1175321,0.0007819707,0.001301771,0.0001698554],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01720034,0.00088932,0.9807867,0.00002682031,0.000481692,0.0002266183,0.00001406511,0.0000301174,0.0003442651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5703511,0.00006083782,0.4293492,0.00002006278,0.0001074652,9.102738e-7,0.000002667563,0.00007182004,0.00003599346],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8105609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7345465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01587961939666387,"score_gpt":0.3162835865562084,"score_spread":0.3004039671595445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}