{"id":"W1977584538","doi":"10.5558/tfc86589-5","title":"Conserving biodiversity in managed forest landscapes: The use of critical thresholds for habitat","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Cegep de Sainte Foy; Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Centre de Géomatique du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Biodiversity; Disturbance (geology); Population; Geography; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Umbrella species; Ecosystem; Forest management; Habitat destruction; Range (aeronautics); Forest ecology; Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Threatened species","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003459244,0.0001041447,0.0001025001,0.00002404595,0.0002279067,0.00004620094,0.0005529794,0.00005722802,0.0005537198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001591434,0.00006304209,0.0000726502,0.0001741023,0.000654218,0.0002416582,0.0003675642,0.0001957462,0.000156472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003369115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001153351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00166828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02200589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999169,0.00003508494,0.0001551429,0.0001634812,0.0001584367,0.0003188826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990043,0.0004514762,0.00004816578,0.0004473271,0.000006805141,0.00004193027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006463592,0.00008808775,0.9413633,0.00004291151,0.00001064258,0.000003461049,0.000458847,0.003335821,0.0003675818,0.009513143,0.04431798,0.0004336057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001106743,0.0001292394,0.9037602,0.00001880045,0.00005405508,0.000006793733,0.0001846999,0.03727522,0.0002749908,0.006990374,0.04996839,0.0002304774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939904,0.00001599206,0.00004049328,0.003904729,0.0001218808,0.0003865135,0.00002336563,0.00001968846,0.001496993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988863,0.000005376011,0.0003016668,0.0004148291,0.0000416039,0.000021493,0.000006127016,0.000007060637,0.0003155129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03760307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02809702010236785,"score_gpt":0.2528471471372817,"score_spread":0.2247501270349138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}