{"id":"W1977636169","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1000981","title":"On the Use of Variance per Genotype as a Tool to Identify Quantitative Trait Interaction Effects: A Report from the Women's Genome Health Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Genetics","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Population Health Research Institute; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Ontario Genomics; Fondation Leducq; Amgen; Ontario Genomics Institute; Donald W. Reynolds Foundation; Doris Duke Charitable Foundation","keywords":"Trait; Biology; Quantitative trait locus; SNP; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Genotype; Genetics; Genome-wide association study; Variance (accounting); Genetic variation; Gene–environment interaction; Covariate; Computational biology; Gene; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03111814,0.0009244115,0.001483314,0.001576605,0.0004888629,0.001193336,0.001075886,0.001106858,0.002662886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08796348,0.0005333204,0.002963121,0.002304269,0.001002201,0.0008341487,0.0010637,0.002154717,0.0003851251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005797556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007847811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005104381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005594788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9791627,0.01665894,0.0005407188,0.001646327,0.001866178,0.0001252314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8459139,0.1430974,0.001763001,0.006579671,0.002341626,0.0003043635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00185656,0.0002380296,0.2479586,0.001624729,0.009524854,0.001283567,0.001373321,0.04808479,0.005260886,0.03045074,0.03278413,0.6195598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001364905,0.002099813,0.2575838,0.001386512,0.008859955,0.004966478,0.0007724368,0.4634171,0.01201499,0.1273929,0.1191823,0.0009588812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1243705,0.01459805,0.840918,0.008448326,0.0008128367,0.0003517431,0.00513449,0.001049249,0.00431674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.649228,0.006102798,0.3350551,0.002706956,0.0006822608,0.0007473596,0.002772928,0.000611309,0.002093315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03111814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1645704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04547745681960524,"score_gpt":0.3421668887861981,"score_spread":0.2966894319665928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}