{"id":"W1977636169","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1000981","title":"On the Use of Variance per Genotype as a Tool to Identify Quantitative Trait Interaction Effects: A Report from the Women's Genome Health Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Genetics","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Population Health Research Institute; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Ontario Genomics; Fondation Leducq; Amgen; Ontario Genomics Institute; Donald W. Reynolds Foundation; Doris Duke Charitable Foundation","keywords":"Trait; Biology; Quantitative trait locus; SNP; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Genotype; Genetics; Genome-wide association study; Variance (accounting); Genetic variation; Gene–environment interaction; Covariate; Computational biology; Gene; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006591883,0.0001672896,0.0002487126,0.00002819277,0.0001597747,0.0000375985,0.0002879716,0.0001110127,0.00006356706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002240655,0.000110636,0.00007433107,0.000109504,0.00006145403,0.000003365948,0.000128655,0.0002334435,0.00003655178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003412604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001323057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001681575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003295807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982601,0.0004301688,0.0004450021,0.0003975113,0.0001910239,0.0002761465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981042,0.0005424285,0.000333104,0.000767727,0.0001783253,0.00007420738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002776744,0.0008621202,0.02113787,0.00001623615,0.0007564971,0.000007819362,0.007231916,0.001808519,0.9635091,0.0002360578,0.002851917,0.001304272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009143026,0.005704837,0.9351259,0.00003241119,0.0001505731,0.00002290209,0.003295684,0.0008449804,0.01719544,0.001635776,0.03456528,0.0005119444],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955515,0.00009767171,0.001526593,0.001394857,0.0003300562,0.0009950725,0.00006452775,0.000007072405,0.00003261537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934868,0.00004048865,0.003297674,0.002609057,0.0001584757,0.0001858755,0.00005510287,0.00002480474,0.0001417615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9463137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4511606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04547745681960524,"score_gpt":0.3421668887861981,"score_spread":0.2966894319665928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}