{"id":"W1977637793","doi":"10.1142/s0218271805007991","title":"THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE AS A PROBE FOR HIGHER DIMENSIONS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Modern Physics D","topic":"Cosmology and Gravitation Theories","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Equivalence principle (geometric); Theoretical physics; General relativity; Gravitation; Weak equivalence; Equivalence (formal languages); Extra dimensions; Classical mechanics; Theory of relativity; Symmetry (geometry); Pure mathematics; Geometry; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001315086,0.0002830488,0.0004041392,0.0009839592,0.001359616,0.002369529,0.000668588,0.001914542,0.01013034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004659069,0.0001755265,0.00028707,0.0009343174,0.006172834,0.006299282,0.002433265,0.003738301,0.0005148106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005430329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004014477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002425756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001974949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994178,0.0002019936,0.00001805886,0.0001021597,0.0001829511,0.00007694772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977332,0.001051932,0.0003256916,0.0004966303,0.0001368091,0.0002557485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119471,0.00001918526,0.0003371937,0.0000143666,0.00000272949,0.00004556432,0.0003338749,0.00007011422,0.001103437,0.9941142,0.0005643179,0.003383208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002093768,0.00004319015,0.001022813,0.00001247936,0.000002581505,0.0001624516,0.0002688799,0.001100638,0.0006141675,0.9892776,0.007463624,0.00001069215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4510027,0.002407864,0.09585885,0.01613203,0.001055852,0.0000833616,0.0002871023,0.0004451835,0.4327271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821201,0.000307605,0.01141909,0.000829057,0.0001921642,0.00004495246,0.00003859875,0.00003349512,0.005014939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01013034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03388935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01873852037460783,"score_gpt":0.3261861242006175,"score_spread":0.3074476038260097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}