{"id":"W1977638009","doi":"10.1016/s0380-1330(01)70648-x","title":"Habitat and Site Affinity of the Round Goby","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Round goby; Goby; Neogobius; Habitat; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002096669,0.0001594781,0.0002631086,0.0009643716,0.0007592067,0.0007206399,0.0003399534,0.0003520417,0.006760572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001334271,0.0001755654,0.000141346,0.0006562787,0.0005520518,0.0003379633,0.0007564656,0.0001785484,0.0006350042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004861655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003017109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0495855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2565884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998422,0.00003908509,0.000008512414,0.00003584554,0.00002269726,0.00005180299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993694,0.0001409009,0.000170898,0.00003426971,0.00006963321,0.0002149135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000413443,0.00004547513,0.9889629,0.00002098955,0.00006184239,0.0003154342,0.001011732,0.0001320375,0.005229238,0.0002231693,0.0002838488,0.003299768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003139408,0.00003145331,0.9985515,0.000003004215,0.00001210251,0.0002457735,0.0007744154,0.0001149639,0.00006623477,0.00003978203,0.0001543054,0.00000326481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993967,0.00002480417,0.00001029985,0.000009960751,5.429754e-7,9.359352e-7,0.00003458724,0.000001024396,0.0005210897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993247,0.00002218544,0.0000354597,0.0000118669,9.386459e-7,0.000002065912,0.00009128443,0.00000379302,0.0005077387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0495855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09859377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04671248480569788,"score_gpt":0.3160402653764432,"score_spread":0.2693277805707453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}