{"id":"W1977645093","doi":"10.1142/s0219198904000150","title":"FORMALIZATION OF MULTI-LEVEL GAMES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Outcome (game theory); Contrast (vision); Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Von Neumann architecture; Generalization; Best response; Extensive-form game; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Computer science; Sequential game; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003530502,0.0001216209,0.0002924058,0.0001440033,0.00003778695,0.00003945731,0.001084251,0.00003912923,0.001850396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002857845,0.00008854762,0.0001920755,0.0004485081,0.0001569501,0.000311625,0.0001142959,0.00008373348,0.001011634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000379657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005868686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002954155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003397216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978032,0.0002050208,0.0008460446,0.0002785292,0.0007432034,0.0001239782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978815,0.0004812728,0.0004734689,0.0005122601,0.0005899312,0.00006152815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001675573,0.0001143917,0.00008067,0.0000464687,0.0000249676,8.647239e-7,0.0001632213,0.0002859223,0.0003566974,0.8514143,0.0003504531,0.1471453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005339802,0.00002946438,0.00249357,0.001066141,0.00003503777,0.00003186813,0.0001038563,0.0001060436,0.002554536,0.8555093,0.137373,0.0001631272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02133918,0.03162266,0.8805222,0.007254304,0.0008563481,0.001179673,0.0002561128,0.0001245631,0.05684495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831359,0.006155409,0.003282991,0.001843369,0.0000700665,0.0000635523,0.00002929812,0.00001352119,0.005405903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9617967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2536500171444254,"score_gpt":0.4591666713175731,"score_spread":0.2055166541731477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}