{"id":"W1977692289","doi":"10.1007/s13253-010-0035-5","title":"A Capture–Recapture Model with Double-Marking, Live and Dead Encounters, and Heterogeneity of Reporting Due to Auxiliary Mark Loss","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Statistics; Econometrics; Event (particle physics); Estimation; Computer science; Mathematics; Demography; Economics; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000240415,0.0001423056,0.000242857,0.00001173626,0.0001056596,0.00001648478,0.0000681302,0.0001227008,0.00008101012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004667541,0.00007314352,0.00002389076,0.00003275729,0.0003913316,0.0001179843,0.0001315343,0.0002474583,0.000001816716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002726157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003585409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000416941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002094575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990588,0.0000293688,0.0004372208,0.000186718,0.0001419012,0.0001459691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991509,0.00007347624,0.0005648886,0.00004808822,0.000007908549,0.0001547818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002073123,0.00006354017,0.9574534,0.000007314945,0.00002576977,0.00005639009,0.0003130239,0.0001875372,0.04003596,0.00002641321,0.0002583694,0.001364995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003487122,0.0004203263,0.996696,0.00001416545,0.00003238478,0.00115272,0.0003403198,0.0001788051,0.000421321,0.0001910907,0.00007768166,0.0001264926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998835,0.00007444846,0.0005855236,0.0002551919,0.00004009026,0.0001113071,0.00005705081,0.000002286967,0.00003904561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855236,0.0001613732,0.01404331,0.0001957038,0.00002634284,0.000002206109,0.00001359085,0.000002782711,0.0000310882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03961464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2982706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01160991129401801,"score_gpt":0.2099909706802707,"score_spread":0.1983810593862527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}