{"id":"W1977700973","doi":"10.1037/a0032588","title":"Surveying for “artifacts”: The susceptibility of the OCB–performance evaluation relationship to common rater, item, and measurement context effects.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nuclear Waste Management Organization","funders":"","keywords":"Common-method variance; Psychology; Variance (accounting); Context (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Empirical research; Statistics; Social psychology; Context effect; Correlation; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2732919,0.0009946784,0.001090716,0.004751694,0.002012098,0.002678496,0.001509972,0.001487459,0.001585593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5719661,0.000922548,0.002149266,0.00499177,0.004149888,0.002705214,0.005203206,0.001800989,0.0005467511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001608341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001476228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002683509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004243493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5813813,0.31779,0.02652565,0.02355728,0.04937496,0.001370782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1840404,0.6510563,0.0666407,0.07589196,0.0212732,0.001097467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007262705,0.0002273963,0.824813,0.001668302,0.004241295,0.0003362206,0.01742323,0.001380504,0.002297546,0.00785861,0.002989888,0.1360378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000126643,0.001245798,0.9466876,0.00169881,0.001623566,0.001839511,0.005084248,0.01036218,0.006563948,0.01118128,0.01330413,0.0002822228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6747917,0.01372194,0.2814467,0.001914253,0.001225465,0.002369781,0.001019395,0.0006465109,0.02286435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672722,0.000507217,0.02878815,0.0008251747,0.0001626141,0.0009296359,0.0003978784,0.0002424062,0.0008747325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7267081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8961605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06277897176891853,"score_gpt":0.3060639831542203,"score_spread":0.2432850113853018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}